Talk:Bømlafjord Tunnel/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Dough4872 (talk · contribs) 03:51, 18 April 2012 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)

 I will put the article on hold for some fixes to be made.  Dough 48  72  03:51, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * The sentence "A report published by SBT in 1987 considered detailed plans a subsea tunnel to the mainland, which was followed up by seismic surveys in the fjord." sounds like its missing a word.
 * "They instead recommended that the municipalities chose a pontoon bridge" does not agree.
 * The sentence "Also Gisle Tjong opposed the project, stating that the risk was too large and that it was uncertain how long the tolls would last: it could just as well be 60 as 15 years" sounds awkward. Also, who is Gisle Tjong?
 * "Construction involved injection of 282 tonnes (278 long tons; 311 short tons) and spaying of 14,900 cubic meters (530,000 cu ft) of gunite." is spaying a correct term or is that a typo?
 * "The tunnel is 11 meters (36 ft) wide and has three lanes, two upwards and one downwards.", what is upwards and downwards referring to? Directions? If so, I would use the cardinal directions here.
 * I guess I'm trying to say "uphill" and "downhill". Please tell me if the change doesn't make sense. Arsenikk (talk)  20:25, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * It appears the tunnel has tolls. Where is the toll plaza located and what is the toll rate for cars?
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Thank you for taking the time to review the article. I have fixed the prose issues and added a little on the toll. Arsenikk (talk)  20:25, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
 * After a couple minor fixes I made myself, I will pass the article.  Dough 48  72  23:34, 18 April 2012 (UTC)