Talk:Büchi automaton

Technical Topics
You have written:

I don't understand the exact meaning of the latter sentence.

For what I understand, I cannot agree on these phrases. First of all, the two formulas are not one the negation of the other. In particular, "eventually follows" cannot become "not followed by" under negation. I understand this is informal: you do not provide the definition of "eventually" and of the rest. Anyway, either you intend "follows" in one or more "steps" (thus you do not need eventually in the first property) or you intend "follows" in exactly one step (thus, you need something like "never" in the second property). Consider this example (t stands for think, r stands for request, a stands for acknowledge):

s1: trttat

s2: trtttt

s1 and s2 above are two finite sequences. The first formula holds for s1 and the second formula holds for s2. You need to specify better what is the language (logic) in which you express the formulas and their semantics. I would suggest to refer to this article about temporal logic. --Valerios (talk) 15:19, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Both in this page and the page on omega-regular languages, the construction that builds a Buchi automaton out of a omega-regular language is not detailed and mentioned as easily obtained from the closure properties of Buchi automata. A pointer would be highly appreciated, or at least some more details. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.50.52.129 (talk) 13:47, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Pronunciation
What is the proper way to pronounce the name "Büchi "?

B/œ/chi see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_phonology Soathana 15:43, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. I found examples here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.180.238.116 (talk) 13:13, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
 * You are wrong: the pronounciation is B/y/chi, with a Close front rounded vowel, similar as in the plural form of the German word "das Buch": "Die Bücher" (mp3). (I am a native speaker of German.) 84.58.232.143 (talk) 18:04, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

No Latex please
Most of the articles are written without latex. Please don't change it (Ashutosh Gupta (talk) 16:48, 25 May 2011 (UTC))