Talk:B.N. Morris Canoe Company

New Page
Just starting this. I noticed other canoe companies had their own articles (instead of being under the main canoe article) and needed to jump in with something on Morris. Kathrynklos (talk)

This is "a work in progress" and feel free to help!

References: Jean Hamilton book
Seems to me that it would be better to use reference name tags for the Jean Hamilton book citations. The same page is cited twice so there's really no need to repeat the entire citation twice. This is just a format change and will not affect any of the cited information at all. For reference, this could be easily done as follows:"The building was four stories high, with a different aspect of canoe construction completed on each floor. When the shop behind the family home became too small for the growing company, it was replaced by a large factory-complex consisting of nine buildings, each serving a step in the canoe-building process."which would look like this"The building was four stories high, with a different aspect of canoe construction completed on each floor. When the shop behind the family home became too small for the growing company, it was replaced by a large factory-complex consisting of nine buildings, each serving a step in the canoe-building process."Just a minor change, but thought I'd discuss it first per WP:CITEVAR - Marchjuly (talk) 01:58, 8 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your help with that. I don't know the codes for many of the things that clean up an article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kathrynklos (talk • contribs) 15:43, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Citation style change proposal
I think it might be a little better to use citation templates when citing sources. Citation templates make it easier to add more information about a particular source because there are so many different parameters available for use. Citation templates can also make it easier to prevent link rot by fixing broken or dead links because the more information an editor knows about a citation, the better chance they have of fixing it. Moreover, the more information a reader knows about a particular source, the better chance they have of verifying the information elsewhere. Here is a specific example taken from the article so that you can see the difference between the current style and what I am proposing.

Source: History of Veazie, Maine by Jean Hamilton.


 * Current (without citation template)"" which looks like this"The building was four stories high, with a different aspect of canoe construction completed on each floor."


 * Proposed (with the citation template (citebook))"" which looks like this"The building was four stories high, with a different aspect of canoe construction completed on each floor."

At first glance, there seems to be no difference at all; the citation will pretty much look the same way in the article regardless of which style is used. However, if you look at the respective "References" sections, the difference between the two styles is easier to see. I understand a template is not required to add more information to a citation; Templates just, in my opinion, make adding that information easier. Furthermore, I understand the style currently being used is fine per WP:CITESTYLE, and that other editors are supposed to defer to it per WP:CITEVAR. However, "CITEVAR" also allows for a change to be made if is there is a consensus for doing so. Comments from other editors would be most appreciated. Thanks in advance. - Marchjuly (talk) 05:06, 12 August 2014 (UTC)