Talk:BAC TSR-2/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Ian Rose (talk) 01:03, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Another great British aircraft saga, like Comet -- how can I resist? Will get on to this in earnest in over the next week -- initial comment though is that for an article of this size, the lead needs to be a bit longer, at least two paragraphs. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 01:03, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Good suggestion, done! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 16:37, 22 November 2010 (UTC).
 * Okay, now that we've got De Havilland Comet out of the way, I think we can all concentrate on this! Will get on to a detailed review shortly... Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 22:43, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
 * By the way, like the re-vamped lead -- nice and punchy, manages to get some complex points across in a straightforward manner without over-simplifying things. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk)

Technical review
 * Pls fix following dab links:
 * Hawker
 * IFF
 * Test Pilot
 * Pls check the External Links tool at above right for a few warning messages.
 * I adjusted and updated the ext. links. But am still getting a warning for the naa.gov.au link (last one). -fnlayson (talk) 16:46, 7 December 2010 (UTC) Removed

GOR.339 Submissions Mission Design Testing Project cancellation General
 * Last sentence of first para needs citation.
 * Last sentence of last para needs citation.
 * Last sentence of last para needs citation.
 * Pls deal with the 'page needed' tag. Replaced
 * Last sentence of last para needs citation.
 * "16 million" what -- I assume pounds but pls specify.
 * Last sentence of last para needs citation.
 * Performed a light copyedit but overall it looks good, well-written/structured/illustrated. I'll place on hold and let you get on with the above items before I check image licensing, refs, and external links.Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 04:22, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Looks like Bzuk and others have taken care of all the issues identified. Anything that was missed or needs addressing?  Thanks. -fnlayson (talk) 18:58, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Tks, was away from internet for a few days but will return to this review shortly. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 23:48, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay, checked image licensing and refs, as well as changes since my last read-through and, apart from the need for a very minor copyedit, it all looked good so happy to pass as GA -- well done all. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 05:57, 18 December 2010 (UTC)