Talk:BANANA

Neologism?
There's a notable lack of references for this apparent neologism. Anyone got any? The POV-pushing tone could do with work too, courtesy said references - David Gerard 00:30, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * I've seen it in The New York Times, although I don't have a link to a specific article handy. 216.214.103.34 18:01, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Wordspy lists the earliest known appearance of this phrase to The Sydney Morning Herald in January 1991. Additional googling indicates that it's in reasonably wide circulation. Feco 02:35, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * wiktionary lists it as well, as a real word not a neologism, though the article has had only two editors, the first of which was just an IP and the second of which appears to have just gussied it with a presumption of its existence's justification so i'm not sure it would bear a request for deletion there. -Ozzyslovechild 7 July 2005 04:42 (UTC)

Its a good term, quite popular here in the UK more so i think, ill do my best to find a quote - br

Merge or redirect
I've removed the Prod tag that was added today, because:

It would be better to either merge&redirect this article to NIMBY, or softredirect it to BANANA, (or do something else). I'm not sure which. Thoughts? -- Quiddity (talk) 18:11, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge with NIMBY first choice, or redirect to wikt second. I was about to prod it as nn, glad I saw this first. Itsmejudith (talk) 13:11, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Done. I redirected this page to the disambig page, to save having to add a hatnote at NIMBY. -- Quiddity (talk) 19:09, 26 June 2010 (UTC)