Talk:BIL Conference

Constructive Feedback
1) Much of the writing tone, esp. in the history section is casual not encyclopedic.  "bit of comedic value", "stepped up", ...

2) I think there's too much comparison between TED and BIL. The "Ted Confab" article does not even mention BIL.  Unless journalists make particular comparisons between BIL and TED, the article cannot either.

3) Every single fact or opinion in the article absolutely must be referenced from a reliable source. Unless there is a reliable source talking about Alexis, Tyler, etc. taking a larger role when the event got bigger as far as wikipedia is concerned it didn't happen.

4) You can probably safely take a single mission statement from the BIL website, but anything beyond that and the article will probably be rejected as PR.

-- Bob drobbs (talk)