Talk:BRAC (organisation)

Merging BRAC with Aarong

 * Disagree: Aarong is famous enough to deserve a separate page. And more importantly most people don't even know that Aarong is owned by BRAC.-Arman Aziz 05:09, 8 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Disagree: BRAC as an over-75% self-sustained NGO operates numerous commercial enterprises, of which Aarong is only one. These enterprises are briefly mentioned in the BRAC article in the context of their contribution to BRAC's development efforts. However, as a well-established commercial brand name in Bangladesh and abroad on its own right, Aarong deserves a separate wiki page. To merge Aarong into the BRAC page would take away from the development focus of the BRAC page. Instead, perhaps the Aarong page can be expanded to highlight the commercial as well as development aspects of Aarong as a self-contained, highly successful business enterprise.


 * Disagree: the idea to merge this article with brac. Infact many people khows aarong who doesnt know what brac is.


 * Maybe a see also for Aarong would be appropriate? Ragity (talk) 19:34, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

BRACeducation operation
Please include that BRAC uses low-payed teachers, ... to hekp them achieve a high degree of cost-efficiency. See low payed BRACeducation teachers (see page 32)

Thanks,

87.64.165.76 13:57, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Age of caretakers
BRAC is humanitarian organization and done well for poverty reduction.If the authority be aware or stop to appoint the care taker at field office under age of eighteen, that is good for the organization.I had seen a care taker of one branch, Eidgah, Cox'sbazar, may be under age of eighteen or immature for work. Please verify and if need to correction. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.56.7.133 (talk • contribs) 00:42, 6 June 2011

Merger proposal
In January 2013, proposed that BRAC: Women's Welfare in Bangladesh be merged into BRAC (NGO). Thread created by Worldbruce (talk) 06:51, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
 * merge BRAC: Women's Welfare in Bangladesh covers a subset of the topics already covered by BRAC (NGO):
 * a capsule summary of BRAC,
 * Economic Development / Financial Empowerment,
 * Education,
 * Public health / Healthcare, and
 * Social development / Prevention of Violence Against Women.
 * A merged article would reduce duplication and would cover these topics more thoroughly and clearly. It would do so without giving the topics undue weight within the merged article, and without making the merged article unwieldy in size. Worldbruce (talk) 23:29, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Neutrality
See for imprecise complaint about this article. I find the wording somewhat promotional. Deb (talk) 20:28, 6 September 2017 (UTC)


 * wp:NPOV is one consequence of primary sources. BRAC is big enough, old enough, & notable enough (if 1/2 of their claims are true) that finding secondary and tertiary sources shouldn't be a problem.  I will comment further below.  Ragity (talk) 19:26, 25 November 2019 (UTC)