Talk:Baby Not on Board/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Secret Saturdays   ( talk to me )  17:56, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) It could use a little more expansion on either "reception" or "production".
 * 2) It has a neutral point of view.
 * 3) There is no edit wars.
 * 4) appropiate use of images
 * 5) It is factually accurate

I'm putting it on hold for some needed expansion. Secret Saturdays  ( talk to me )  17:56, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Please provide a more detailed analysis. Thanks. Gage (talk) 18:32, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes please speciyfy what do you wish to be done. -- Pedro J. the rookie 08:50, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

Well, the recepetion section mainly focuses on the negative comments made on the episode, and could use a little more reviews on it(and I changed my mind about the "production" section;that one is just fine.) Secret Saturdays   ( talk to me )  17:43, 9 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Thats what i can expaned for the reception on positive grounds. -- Pedro J. the rookie 18:16, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

I give the article a Pass then. Secret Saturdays  ( talk to me )  23:20, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Er, really? Did you read the article? Did you happen to notice any sentences ending in commas? Links to disambiguation pages? Did you happen to notice the following sentence: Commented negatively on the Back to the Future references and the very similar Home Alone plotline and"? Or this one: But he did comment positively to some jokes such as the fight between Peter and Quagmire, Stewie capturing Quagmire and Cleveland and Stewie´s reaction to the magazine under Chris bed.? -- Beloved Freak  23:43, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
 * That's exactly why I was reluctant to have this person review the article. Gage (talk) 23:58, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I myself as the nominator must say that the review felt a bit flat. -- Pedro J. the rookie 00:13, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I've nominated this article for GAN, but it's gonna be hard now, since the Production section needs to be expanded now! Railer-man (talk) 01:30, 29 April 2011 (UTC)