Talk:Baby Tooth Survey

British/Australian program in Australia
The CSIRO conducted an equivalent of this program in Australia and it was used to inform both the Australian government's decision to ask the British to cease testing (and exposing Australians to fallout) and the British decision to participate in the atmospheric test ban treaty. The study showed repeated, high levels of exposure to children in Adelaide, after the tests at Maralinga, and even higher levels of exposure across the country when the atmospheric hydrogen bombs were tested. There was a substantial documentary on ABC about it, around a decade ago, and it probably warrants not only it's own article, but a section in this one. It also mentioned that the Soviets conducted their own program, and it was what scared them into proposing the ban.--Senor Freebie (talk) 14:49, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion: You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:37, 25 February 2022 (UTC) ++ The logo is NOT protected copywrite. You can tell (if you are trained in such matters) because it does NOT have the © symblol. This is from a letter ADDRESSED TO ME. Plaese don't wreck my work again. Tiptopper (talk) 16:55, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
 * St. Louis Baby Tooth Study.png
 * This made me really sad. How can we get this picture back again? Can we not have nontrivial logotypes at all in wikipedia, or is there some kind of "loophole"? If you photograph the your letter, does that photo count as copyright infringement? :C · · · Omnissiahs hierophant (talk) 19:28, 28 April 2022 (UTC)