Talk:Bachar Houli

Assessment completed for
As per either a recent request at or because this article was listed as fully or partly unassessed at WikiProject Australia/Assessment I have just now completed a rating of the article and posted my results to this page. Those results are detailed above in the template box. Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, I am unable to leave detailed comments other than to make the following brief observation: no further comments at this time  However if you have specific questions, please write to me on my talk page and as time permits I will try to provide you with my reasoning. Please put my talk page on your watchlist if you do ask such a question because in the case of these responses I will only post my answer underneath your question. ALSO if you do not agree with the rating you can list it in the "Requesting an assessment section", and someone will take a look at it.-- VS  talk 08:29, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

pronunciation
I'm assuming the stress is on the BASH. Please correct if I'm wrong. kwami (talk) 10:21, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

AFL Tribunal Result
I have placed a POV notice on the recently added information regarding the result of the AFL Tribunal hearing. While many news media express concern over the length of sentencing and the high profile nature of his character witnesses, the information that has been added shows bias. It is clearly sarcastic through saying that 'he won the AFL Tribunal lottery' and has made assertions about others in the paragraph that are not sourced and are likely to be false or considered libelous. I would like other editors to help in determining how this paragraph could be edited in order to remove any concerns of bias and/or to help to find sources regarding the material present. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adocrat (talk • contribs) 02:32, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bachar Houli. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080323024820/http://www.muslimnews.co.uk/paper/index.php?article=2830 to http://www.muslimnews.co.uk/paper/index.php?article=2830

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:04, 13 July 2017 (UTC)