Talk:Bachelor of Ayurveda, Medicine and Surgery

Links which can be added

 * http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-08-10/pune/33136693_1_ayurveda-doctors-allopathic-ayurveda-practitioners — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abhijeet Safai (talk • contribs) 05:17, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Request to make this page semi protected
There are many changes in the article which are non referenced. I may not get time always to revert them. May I request to make this page semi protected ? Thanks. --Abhijeet Safai (talk) 06:43, 19 November 2013 (UTC)


 * I am not aware as where to make the requests, Please make this page semi protected urgently. Thanks. --Abhijeet Safai (talk) 06:05, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
 * That would be Requests for Page protection. But generally this is only done for persistent vandalism, not content disputes. DES (talk) 06:14, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Ok I understand now. I guess that visiting the page again and again and removing the wrong information is the only way out for current situation. Anyways. Thanks a lot. --Abhijeet Safai (talk) 11:02, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
 * There is content dispute at this article and particular non referenced information is being put again and again. Sincere request to experienced editors to look into it. I will not be able to revert it always as sometimes it is hard for me to find time. --Abhijeet Safai (talk) 06:29, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bachelor of Ayurveda, Medicine and Surgery. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120710080954/http://www.ccimindia.org/syllabus/ug-syllabus-2010.pdf to http://www.ccimindia.org/syllabus/ug-syllabus-2010.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:15, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Lot of references are removed from this article
I can see that many of the references are removed form this article. May I request someone to first 1) Find relevant missing references which were previously there in the articles and were removed by some reason 2) List them here and finally 3) Again put those relevant references at relevant places after discussion and consensus. (Please do not put the references directly in the article without discussing here because they might have been removed for some valid reason.) People interested in editing this article can do this task. Thank you. -- Abhijeet Safai (talk) 05:17, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

edited by Vinay veerabhadrappa — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.205.152.154 (talk) 09:14, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Nia.nic.in DrAbhinesh (talk) 11:26, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Revert
After fixing various recently introduced issues I reverted to an earlier revision that seemed closer to Wikipedia policies. The remaining information is already available at the main Ayurveda article. — Paleo Neonate  – 05:50, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

Suggested links
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0975947620300425

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0975947620300255

Ayurveda and COVID-19: Where psychoneuroimmunology and the meaning response meet: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889159120306371

Controversial identities of medicinal plants in classical literature of Ayurveda: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0975947618303747

Effectiveness of an Ayurveda treatment approach in knee osteoarthritis – a randomized controlled trial: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1063458418300827

Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal - Modern perspectives of an ancient Rasayana from Ayurveda https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378874120330397

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rohitashchandra (talk • contribs) 00:27, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
 * All hopelessly useless, unsuitable for our use. see WP:MEDRS -Roxy the inedible dog . wooF 07:22, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 4 September 2020
The page features claims about "pseudoscience" nature of Ayurveda without giving scientific references about any scientific studies. 2405:6E00:ED1:B400:24B5:D3F7:B960:7E40 (talk) 01:39, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Not a request for an edit. -Roxy the inedible dog . wooF 04:24, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

BAMS(Bachelor of Ayurvedic medicine and surgery ) is now completely scientific
and the government of India permit all graduates and masters for practice equivalent to an allopathic doctor. There are lots of scope in health care departments especially in Non communicable diseases. BAMS(Bachelor of Ayurvedic medicine and surgery ) is now completely scientific and the government of India permit all graduates(BAMS) and masters(MD/Ms Ayu.) for practice equivalent to an allopathic doctor. There are lots of scope for an Ayurvedic physician in health care departments especially in Non communicable diseases. Ayurvedic medicines have potential for all era of health care systems. 171.79.156.49 (talk) 11:07, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
 * No sources provided, which we would need to include any of this information. Black Kite (talk) 13:34, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 8 February 2022
Ayurveda is not pseudoscience..every medicine and disease is explained in a scientific way in samhita so please don't call it pseudoscience. It is the traditional pathy of India and many disease which r incurable by allopathy can be cured with ayurveda.In ayuvedic texts every disease is explained with proper pathophysiology which is applicable and relatable with today's modern diseases so please edit this content with proper knowledge. Thank you 117.228.207.100 (talk) 14:29, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the template. This is sourced, and there is consensus for the current wording. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:32, 8 February 2022 (UTC)