Talk:Bachelor of Homeopathic Medicine and Surgery

Review
This article is highly biased, just on tha basis of few references you can't frame a verdict in one line that it is a pdeudoscience. Let the readers decide that it is pseudoscience or advanced nanoscience. Your job is to provide information only in a very neutral manner and not forming a unfair verdict. This article is not updated also, in 2020 only NEET-ug is the valid entrance test required for taking admission to BHMS and all other entrance test had been abolished. Another biasm can be seen when author says that homeopathic doctors are struggling in jobs just by giving reference of one old news article of one job description of only one state out of all 28 states of India. Therefore the sources are not enough to proove this fact. Im luciferx (talk) 17:25, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The sources are fine and the agreement in the scientific community is there. I removed the employment bit: I agree with you. Drmies (talk) 17:29, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Questionable source
See discussion at Reliable sources/Noticeboard

Related: Fringe theories/Noticeboard

--Guy Macon (talk) 13:53, 3 March 2021 (UTC)