Talk:Back to Mono (1958–1969)

Untitled
First paragraph: the only exception to what? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.176.103.74 (talk) 00:35, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Backtomono.jpg
Image:Backtomono.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:28, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

All mono mixes?
Unless I've missed it, the article doesn't currently state if all tracks on this compilation are in fact mono mixes as the name implies. Obviously practically all single releases before the 70s would have been mono mixes and Spector produced many of his early recordings in the expectation that only mono mixes would be needed. However, River Deep, Mountain High has an original stereo studio mix which is the one normally used in compilations, and I suspect this is true of most of the late 60s stuff.

Unfortunately I don't own this box set so can't just listen to it to find out. Is there a WP:RS review somewhere which sheds light on this? --Ef80 (talk) 20:56, 30 June 2015 (UTC)