Talk:Backcountry.com

Original research
This article seems to be entirely original research and as such is in violation of important Wikipedia policies. It needs sources other than the company's own websites (which do not count for verification purposes). Whether the information is true or not, it must be verifiable or this article could be removed from Wikipedia. I've removed some of the claims that could be construed to be advertising without a source to verify, but left some of lesser consequence such as where/how the company was founded. Either way, some sources to assert notability for this business are necessary.  Big Nate 37 (T) 06:17, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Added the source of the 'top 50' claim, as well as the source for the 'noted for open source' bit. Davejenk1ns 05:11, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Update
The page has been updated to include 3rd party sources. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.98.93.155 (talk) 01:21, 21 April 2009 (UTC)