Talk:Backspacer

Untitled
I've not edited anything on here before, but there's an interview up with Kelly Curtis stating that one of the songs (possible first single) is called The Fixer - http://ca.reuters.com/article/entertainmentNews/idCATRE55104S20090602?pageNumber=1&virtualBrandChannel=0 PrimalSurf (talk) 06:29, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the proposal was consensus for move as the primary topic.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 15:02, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

Backspacer (Pearl Jam album) → Backspacer — Per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, the other album of this name only has one real incoming link. The Pearl Jam album can then have a link to a disambig page for the tour and the Supergrove album. -- Lugnuts  (talk) 13:18, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Support Although I do not think a disamb link to the Backspacer Tour is necessary. indopug (talk) 13:50, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Support: Pearl Jam gets over 1,000,000 ghits compared to just a few hundred for Supergroove, clearly the primary topic. --JD554 (talk) 18:26, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Support per above. — INTRIGUE B LUE (talk|contribs) 20:12, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Support As the person who bifurcated these in the first place, it's clear that this has become the primary meaning of "Backspacer." Someone would be likely to expect this meaning, so it should be the main one. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:41, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Reference list
I suggest the implementation of  on this article, because of the length of the reference list. Opinions, rejections? —bender235 (talk) 19:41, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Sure I always use, but I'm not going to object to someone defining the size of the columns. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:11, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay. Could you tell me why you use ? Just out of habit, or do you see any advantages using it compared to  ? —bender235 (talk) 22:11, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Widths I'm in favor of using relative widths so that users' browsers and preferences can determine how big something is. If you determine the width in ems (or pixels), then you are forcing others to conform to what you want them to have. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:04, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Sure, but that argument can be easily turned around. Because if you determine the number of columns, you're forcing this on others as well. But the problem here is that let's say three columns may look good on your screen, but awkward on a larger screen, and pretty much unreadable on a smaller screen (like a netbook or tablet). Using  solves that problem, because you can determine on what width the refs look good. You might have all short refs (like here), so using   just fits, or you might have longer refs (like here), so it's better to use  . Using a fixed column set (like  ) would suit neither. —bender235 (talk) 03:08, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Huh I'm not sure that I follow... Again, if you want to define the column width, that's fine with me--I certainly won't revert it (or if I do, it would only be because I'm kind of not paying attention in the future; it wouldn't be out of pettiness.) I don't mean to brush off your argument, either: you are clearly more invested in this than me and you've bothered to post to talk and explain your position. I have no substantial objection, so I say go for it. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:46, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 one external links on Backspacer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.oricon.co.jp/rank/ja/w/2012-12-03/more/4/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091112030515/http://www.aria.com.au/pages/httpwww.aria.com.aupagesARIACharts-Accreditations-2009Albums.htm to http://www.aria.com.au/pages/httpwww.aria.com.aupagesARIACharts-Accreditations-2009Albums.htm
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.fimi.it/up/files/pdfddm/GfK_Certificazione%20album%20(phy%2Bdig)_wk%2052-2013%20def.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100413111457/http://www.aria.com.au/pages/aria-charts-end-of-year-charts-top-100-albums-2009.htm to http://www.aria.com.au/pages/aria-charts-end-of-year-charts-top-100-albums-2009.htm
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.billboard.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:27, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Backspacer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090711174314/http://www.pearljam.com/news/pearl-jam-announces-north-american-tour-dates-support-their-new-studio-album-backspacer to http://pearljam.com/news/pearl-jam-announces-north-american-tour-dates-support-their-new-studio-album-backspacer
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.pearljam.com/news/2010-european-tour-announced
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.oricon.co.jp/prof/artist/129344/ranking/cd_album/
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.fimi.it/up/files/pdfddm/GfK_Certificazione%20album%20%28phy%2Bdig%29_wk%2052-2013%20def.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 13:57, 13 July 2017 (UTC)