Talk:Backup Exec

Ad?
What's going on here? Are we providing an advertisement space for BE here? Why else would we link to a PDF describing how you can manage millions of BE servers centrally? What has this to do with an encyclopedia? -Thiesi 11:08, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

I Second that 68.45.4.118 16:38, 16 July 2007 (UTC)


 * I disagree. A companies flap sheet needs only to be balenced with a bug report/limitations list.

I agree, totally an AD. Outrageous. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.223.214.130 (talk) 10:19, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Ad. Definitively. Alex (unsigned) 11:59, 26 Januar 2016 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.159.101.179 (talk)

Stilly/stupid
"Backup Exec shared the same Microsoft Tape Format with Windows' built-in NTbackup." Isnt this kind of silly/stupid, since NTBackup says its based on Backup Exec, is copyright Veritas, and is basically a crippled version ( i.e. cannot do a few features ) of Backup exec 5? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.174.157.126 (talk) 21:35, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Backup Exec. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160305052804/http://lifliycmww.weebly.com/blog/symantec-backup-exec-2010-deduplication-and-archiving-suite-essential-support-1 to http://lifliycmww.weebly.com/blog/symantec-backup-exec-2010-deduplication-and-archiving-suite-essential-support-1
 * Added tag to ftp://usys-ftp.ethz.ch/ISG/DVD_BE2015/BE/WinNT/Install/DOCS/beqckinstl_en.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 15:00, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Licensing Change Discussion
The licensing area of the page is out of date and perhaps needs removal. It has nothing to do with the program functionality and licensing models can change yearly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.25.3.147 (talk) 20:13, 11 October 2023 (UTC)