Talk:Baclayon Church/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: 23W (talk · contribs) 00:15, 21 December 2014 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Comments

 * I see one clarification needed tag in the lead.
 * Clarified. --Carlojoseph14 (talk) 15:07, 29 December 2014 (UTC)


 * The Manual of Style suggests the lead should be two paragraphs. The last sentence by itself can probably be merged into the preceding paragraph.
 * Done. Merged. --Carlojoseph14 (talk) 15:07, 29 December 2014 (UTC)


 * The two one-sentence paragraphs in the history section should probably be merged into the preceding paragraphs, if logical.
 * Done. Merged. I think it is logical --Carlojoseph14 (talk) 15:07, 29 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Regarding the headings, is "Retablo" supposed to be capitalized? It's set in lowercase in the body and captions.
 * Noted, changes done. --Carlojoseph14 (talk) 15:07, 29 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Some redundant in-line citations can probably be eliminated (i.e., remove references from the end of consecutive sentences if they're the same reference number).
 * Noted, changes done. --Carlojoseph14 (talk) 15:07, 29 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Toolbox tools turned up nothin' major, so that's good.

Nice work for a beautiful church; sad about the earthquake. ;( On hold for two weeks. 23W 00:40, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
 * , Please see my reply after each comments. Thanks. --Carlojoseph14 (talk) 15:07, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi, you might want to review the nomination. Thanks. --Carlojoseph14 (talk) 14:25, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the wait! I've been tremendously busy, but I'll have a follow-up soon. 23W 23:26, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Changes look good. I've made the following revisions here; they mostly involve grammar and minor MOS things. (Finally) passing this now; thank you for being patient with me over this month! 23W 22:14, 17 January 2015 (UTC)