Talk:Bacon: A Love Story/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Ha  dg  er  21:54, 9 January 2010 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)

This is an okay article. It was written very well and complies with the guidelines (if I'm not mistaken, that means something like "doesn't break the guidelines and follows them").
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * The second paragraph in the lead section should be merged into the reception section. The second and third paragraph in the author section should also be merged into the reception section. Also, I barely found any grammar errors. Other than that, the article is prose and follows the Manual of Style.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * There is no original research or self-published sources. There are good references and reliable sources, so this article is verifiable.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Like I mentioned on the first part of this, the section paragraph of the lead section and the second and third paragraphs of the section about the author should be merged into the reception section. Other than that, the article is broad in its coverage.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * This article doesn't contain the words to avoid and doesn't have opinions but instead has fact about opinions, so this article follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * There are no edit wars or any other type of conflict that would harm the article, so this article is stable.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * This article is okay with the images. I understand why it only has one, and I know it's because other images would be non-free, so I marked this part about images as neutral.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Congratulations! This article passes as a good article. Good job! -- Ha dg  er  21:54, 9 January 2010 (UTC)