Talk:Bad Biology

Missing Information and Expansion
This article is missing important information on the film's production which needs to be added to the article. The plot summary should also be expanded a little bit more as well.--Paleface Jack (talk) 23:12, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Bad Biology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131506305700/http://www.filmthreat.com/interviews/1199/ to http://www.filmthreat.com/interviews/1199/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131506313000/http://www.filmthreat.com/reviews/10906/ to http://www.filmthreat.com/reviews/10906/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 22:41, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Ratings
"Rotten Tomatoes, a review aggregator, reports that 100% of five surveyed critics gave the film a positive review; the average rating is 7.2/10." Five is the minimum number of critis to even get a rating percentage at all on Rotten Tomatoes. That number is really far too low to be reliable. A result of 100% while users only gave 36% is pretty misleading. 77.185.153.180 (talk) 17:25, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
 * User ratings are irrelevant per WP:USERG. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:56, 15 March 2023 (UTC)