Talk:Bad Elk v. United States/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Buffbills7701 (talk · contribs) 21:46, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Comments

 * Nicely cited.
 * "...discuss the issue as defense against unlawful force, and most also note that a person may not use force to resist an unlawful arrest." Shouldn't most become must?
 * The article states that in 1999, "sixteen states had eliminated the right to resist unlawful arrest..." Is there a more recent version?
 * Same thing with this line. "By 1999, twenty-three states had eliminated the right to resist unlawful arrest by statute."

Addressing:
 * "...discuss the issue as defense against unlawful force, and most also note that a person may not use force to resist an unlawful arrest." Shouldn't most become must?
 * ✅ Clarified most to show that it meant "most of the cases" citing Bad Elk.


 * The article states that in 1999, "sixteen states had eliminated the right to resist unlawful arrest..." Is there a more recent version?


 * Same thing with this line. "By 1999, twenty-three states had eliminated the right to resist unlawful arrest by statute."
 * ✅. GregJackP   Boomer!   04:04, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Verdict

 * I'll put it on hold for a week. Seeing as you've retired, I might put it on hold for a bit longer. Great article, by the way. buffbills7701 21:46, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Great job. The article passes.