Talk:Bad originalism

Merge with Originalism
This seems to me to be a POV fork, so I'm suggesting a merge. Originalism is a fairly long article, so it may be that what is really needed is some careful editing to note this concept in that article and then leave this somewhat in place. I'm not sure, though. Erechtheus (talk) 02:50, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree it should be merged. This is a POV fork.Ferrylodge (talk) 20:58, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Clarify please
This article needs to be made more clear and easier to understand. Also it is not clearhow prominent or notible this 'bad originalism' view is. Otherwise it should just be a 'criticism' section within the Originalism article. m.e. (talk) 15:16, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

I agree that "bad originalism" is not a notable phrase - instead it is just another critique of originalism. --Enos733 (talk) 02:10, 21 July 2008 (UTC)