Talk:Badults

Requested move 12 May 2015

 * The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 13:38, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Badults (TV series) → Badults – I changed the target of this redirect after declining an improper attempt at speedy deletion. However, I think it would be prudent to move the target Badults (TV series) to this location, as it would seem to be the primary topic under this name. Safiel (talk) 23:31, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I second this move request as being technical in nature per WP:PRECISE. – Steel1943  (talk) 23:41, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
 * This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:33, 13 May 2015 (UTC)


 * What is "this location"? Please be clear and avoid elegant variation. What is to be moved to where? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:33, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Umm, I though this was rather clear, especially considering my statement about WP:PRECISE. The disambiguator is unnecessary. (Well, Safiel and David-King, this was unexpected.) Steel1943  (talk) 05:37, 13 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Speedy move/strong support since all this move is doing is removing the disambiguator. The ambiguous title already redirects here. In fact, I actually move to close this discussion and re-request it on WP:RMTR since I'm really not understanding the contest. Steel1943  (talk) 05:40, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Move it to “Badults”. “Badults” refers only to this TV show, so the disambiguator is unnecessary. Gorobay (talk) 13:00, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Move per above. I'm failing to understand why this was contested - the plain title redirects here and there are no other contenders for primary topic. The redirect resulting from this move should be tagged as and . Thryduulf (talk) 16:45, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Definitely move. One does not require the skills of an adept logician to conclude that Anthony Appleyard has deficient comprehension skills. His contestation should thereby be repudiated. David-King (talk) 21:45, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Support. I can't find any other use of this term in Wikipedia. kennethaw88 • talk 16:53, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.