Talk:Bagley & Wright

'Under Construction' tag removed.
I have removed the 'Under Construction' tag from this article because it is approaching the content that I envisaged when I started. I would appreciate comments on its improvement from more experienced editors. The article was given a 'C' quality rating some time ago. What can I do to improve this? Ian (talk) 17:05, 28 September 2008 (UTC)


 * To move forwards you may wish to take this through a formal peer review for feedback on grammar, neutrality, formatting. Following that, the next tier is achieving the Wikipedia Good Article standard. --Jza84 | Talk  11:20, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Recent changes
I've made some changes to the article, mainly editing for tone. For example, where the subject is unambiguous, it's more approriate to refer to them by their surname. There were also a few instances of the word "we" as in "we know" or "we do not know"; this is rather informal, so I have replaced these with "it is known" or "it is not known" etc. Nev1 (talk) 18:02, 13 October 2008 (UTC)