Talk:Baháʼí–Azali split

This article has a ton of problems
So many citations are needed. Unsourced claims are everywhere. In some places it is so strongly pov for the Babis and then in another paragraph an author goes on an off-topic tangent against them. Even cited statements are still pov for both sides. There's a general unencyclopedic tone. It needs a lot of work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.174.177.237 (talk) 03:56, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Name of article
Should this be titled "Bahá'í/Bábí split" or "Bahá'í/Azali split"?108.203.77.186 (talk) 07:27, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

It should be "Bahá'í/Bábí split", this article is so pro-Bahá'í it wouldn't be accepted in any encyclopedia. The Bahá'í pov is like 20x bigger than the Bábí pov. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.29.115.49 (talk) 13:10, 7 August 2015 (UTC)