Talk:Bakersfield, California

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Bakersfield, California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120602025604/http://www.eecs.mit.edu/images/pub71_tax_rates.pdf to http://www.eecs.mit.edu/images/pub71_tax_rates.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090326151155/http://parks.ca.gov/pages/712/files/052605.pdf to http://parks.ca.gov/pages/712/files/052605.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100927042654/http://www.kernsheriff.com/Detentions/Pages/default.aspx to http://www.kernsheriff.com/Detentions/Pages/default.aspx
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100924004918/http://www.kernsheriff.com/Detentions/CRF/Pages/default.aspx to http://www.kernsheriff.com/Detentions/CRF/Pages/default.aspx
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100927073841/http://www.kernsheriff.com/Detentions/Lerdo/Minimum/Pages/default.aspx to http://www.kernsheriff.com/Detentions/Lerdo/Minimum/Pages/default.aspx
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100927073836/http://www.kernsheriff.com/Detentions/Lerdo/MaxMed/Pages/default.aspx to http://www.kernsheriff.com/Detentions/Lerdo/MaxMed/Pages/default.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 11:03, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Merge proposal: List of sites of interest in Bakersfield, California to here
List of sites of interest in Bakersfield, California has been in CAT:NN's backlog for over 10 years and is unreferenced. I don't think it meets WP:LISTN or WP:GNG, but could be a useful section in this well-written article. Proposing a merge/redirect as an WP:ATD. Boleyn (talk) 06:27, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
 * ✅ Klbrain (talk) 11:46, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Crime
According to an article the top 20 most dangerous neighbor hooods in Bakersfield are : Lake View, East Bakersfield, Rio Bravo, Southgate, Amberton, Quialwood, Homaker park, beton park, East Bridge, Estates, Downtown, Tyner homes, Spice Track, Oleander sunset, sagepoint, stockdale Greens, park Stockdale, CollegeHieghts Baker street, Rexland Acers, Stone meadows, haggin oaks. With a crime rate of 491.43 per 100,000 residents Bakersfield is considered one of the most dangerous cities in Californa. In 2004 Bakersfiled's crime rate was 710.53 per 100,000 residents. Bakersfield has many gangs on different sides of Bakersfield. The different areas in Bakersfield are Central Bakersfield also known as(Downtown),North Bakersfield,Northeast,East Bakersfield,Southeast, Bakersfield,Southwest,Northwest. With gangs like Eastside Crips, Westside Crips,Country Boy Crips,Southside Bakers,Varrio Rexland Park,Varrio Bakers,Loma Bakers,Okie Bakers,Greenfield Bakers,Oildale Peckerwoods,Eastside Lamont,arrio Chico Lamont,Lamont Familia Surenos,Arvina Locos,Arvina Poorside,Varrio Weedpatch,Brown Pride,Varrio Nueva Estrada,Deadly Young Psyclones,Hillside Loma Bakers,Warlord Piru,Eastside Bakers,Westside bakers according to Bakersfield Gang Map. And according to another website there are gangs like spoonie g crips,stroller boy crips, mid city crips,lakeview gangsta crips,project crips,clifton mob crips,westside gangsta crips, west side crips, west side family crips,watts & lotus blocc crips,melwood blocc crips aka helwood,bradshaw hustler gang,mad blocc crips,reece & cheetam blocc aka rc blocc,cottonwood crips,westside warlord piru,loma bakers 13,hillside loma bakers 13,colonia bakers 13,okie bakers 13,varrio bakers 13,bakers sur trece gang,southside bakers 13,lil locos (ss bakers),southgate locos (ss bakers) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:9008:1A03:8C84:3074:70D4:911B:3379 (talk) 01:10, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Crime rates
What’s the crime rate in Bakersfield ? 2603:8000:753F:7147:E9CF:FA00:C731:5CBE (talk) 16:29, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

Theres two different population numbers
One for the census, one how it is now. Should we remove the census because it is outdated? Janlopi (talk) 21:34, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm assuming you're referring to the number in the lead? If so, no, we should remove the other one for being unsourced. That number, furthermore, is actually for the urban area around Bakersfield and not Bakersfield itself. I, however, cannot find a source backing that number up, and as such will be removing it as unsourced. SkyWarrior  21:54, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
 * thank Janlopi (talk) 21:21, 6 October 2023 (UTC)