Talk:Bakht Singh

Untitled
I also don't see any evidence of "fawning" or a portrayal of Christianity as the best religion. This article does appear to have a neutral point of view.

Lonesome road 19:54, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Great. All we need is a POV war by Christians and non-Christians over how to depict a famous Christian. . I suggest that this article be tagged for cleanup. What are those excerpts at the bottom by a Dr. T.E. Koshy? Are they copywrited? If they aren't copywrited, they need to be integrated into the rest of the text. Doesn't at all conform to the wikipedia style guidlines. --Eremgumas (talk) 18:57, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Arnoldthomas (talk) 14:25, 17 November 2009 (UTC)Christianity should be experienced and then the reason can be found how X'ianity is good than all.

WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 17:24, 9 November 2007 (UTC) There is nothing offensive in this article. Gpr123 (talk) 04:39, 20 May 2008 (UTC) GPR123

I wish this article never to be cleaned up. It talks about a saint a holy man. His history should be known to generations. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.227.79.2 (talk) 12:26, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

As an evangelical Christian I wold like to second the call for clean-up. Wikipedia is secular enyclopedia yet in places this article reads like a devotional "Life of the Saints." It does not diminish Bakht Singh's stature to respect Wikipedia's guidelines by describing his life and ministry in neutral and secular terms rather than partisan and religious ones, especially as those interested can follow the links to more religiously oriented websites.

To the first commenter: it does not do you or your non-Christian position any credit to refer to ANY fellow human as "Butt." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.117.77.225 (talk) 05:04, 8 September 2008 (UTC) there is a lot of anger when christianity is seen as the best religion i think it is to do with the atitude of those who do not seek peace and are afraid of the impact of this old religion on the new world. Jesus is God and the followers are proving it time after time as they come to share their lives to the broken and poor. true religion is none other than the one that cares for the poor and destitute. if you want to make a point dont do it here do it in your life actions for they speak louder and you will be remembered as a saint in the coming generations. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.69.36.206 (talk) 21:44, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Bakht Singh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101008053526/http://gloryofhiscross.org/apostle8.htm to http://www.gloryofhiscross.org/apostle8.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 15:38, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bakht Singh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101008053526/http://gloryofhiscross.org/apostle8.htm to http://www.gloryofhiscross.org/apostle8.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 23:56, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

www.hebronnetwork.org spam
I removed the http://www.hebronnetwork.org/ link as the site is spam. Does any know what the link is refurling to and what it can be replaced with? Eusebius1517 (talk) 16:12, 7 March 2024 (UTC)