Talk:Balaenoptera sibbaldina

Is this article necessary?
I don't see why this invalid species warrants its own article. The hype about it in some corners of the internet has no scientific justification, and should not be reinforced here. This is not a valid species, the fossils probably don't even all belong to a single taxon, and there is nothing significant about them. Ashorocetus (talk &#124;  contribs) 17:07, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
 * This article isn't necessary; fossil species are typically covered in an article about the genus. Plantdrew (talk) 01:38, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
 * OK, glad to see someone agrees. This article is especially unnecessary because it is not even close to being a valid species. I'm planning on redirecting this page to Balaenoptera but I want to see if there is any objections first. Ashorocetus (talk &#124;  contribs) 03:25, 31 May 2018 (UTC)