Talk:Baldwin RF-16

steam generators
Were any RF-16's fitted with steam generators for passenger service?132.235.134.217 17:06, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 one external links on Baldwin RF-16. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20050904092425/http://www.bridge-line.org:80/blhs/RidingSharks.html to http://www.bridge-line.org/blhs/RidingSharks.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060116215207/http://www.bridge-line.org:80/ to http://www.bridge-line.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 12:17, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Baldwin RF-16. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927122927/http://www.psrm.org/roster/diesel/baldwin/index.html to http://www.psrm.org/roster/diesel/baldwin/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 15:24, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

A Bit Confusing
....built for freight service by the Baldwin Locomotive Works between 1950 and 1953...As was the case with most passenger locomotives...

I believe this is saying that this locomotive, even though it was designed for freight, had the same feature as most passenger locomotives... But stated this way it can be read that the RF-16 was a passenger locomotive. I'm not sure if this is correct, so I don't want to change the sentence, but I would suggest clarification, either way. 72.49.83.109 (talk) 01:01, 27 September 2020 (UTC)