Talk:Baltimore railroad strike of 1877/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Auntieruth55 (talk · contribs) 17:18, 4 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Nicely done. You are missing a foot note in the 6th Regiment section.
 * I fixed a broken sentence toward the end. see here
 * Let me know when you've added the citation in and I'll check the images and pass. auntieruth (talk) 17:18, 4 July 2017 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:


 * I'm not sure what footnote you are referencing that is missing, and also do you mean in inline citation or a note? Timothy Joseph Wood  02:24, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Reping . Timothy Joseph Wood  02:25, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
 * All is good now! :)  Passed.  Nicely done.  auntieruth (talk) 13:49, 5 July 2017 (UTC)