Talk:Ban Pako

Article Evaluation
Ban Pako does speak in a neutral tone but is very vague about the history of the resort that lies near an “ancient temple”. The site itself is not described very well and did not give any background other than its geographical location. The article also does not expand on why these people had such pottery skills and what were they doing with these pots and skills. The two references on the page do work and are relevant to Ban Pako. Something that can be added can be the history of any of the people living in the area and cultural and behavioral practices that they had in their societies. No information is provided about the use or purpose of the temple which is something worth researching further. During class, we argue single or multiple points while Wikipedia tries to give you a plethora of information that is unbiased and that means including all sides to a subjectWestontengan1 (talk) 04:10, 27 January 2022 (UTC).