Talk:Bang Bros

Merging into "Bang Bus"
I wonder why a website that supposedly has zillions of hits every day does not get a better coverage. Who are the owners? How long has the site been up? What media coverage do they get? Etc etc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.144.87.220 (talk) 23:57, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

That does not make sense. The only reason why Bang Bros is a bigger and more complete article is because its subject - the Bang Bus section of Bang Bros. - was the first to be online (dating back to 2001, I guess). The success of Bang Bros. knowedly offsprung from Bang Bus, but today it is a "directory" that counts on likely more than 15 sites with different porn themes ( see Bang Bros. Network). I think, at most and instead, Bang Bus is the one that should be merged into Bang Bros. and this last one reorganized and improved to feature the other sites. Denis Mattos 05:35, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

I agree that bang bus should be merged in bang bros. The main site network should be keep, and not a single site article. --R2cyberpunk 16:27, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Wtf ever happened to Backroom Facials?

whatever happened to Backroom Facials?

Unsourced material
I think it is in the best interest for this article to add an unreferenced tag to the article than to delete the majority of the article, half of which doesn't need a source such as the list of the websites on the network. Acidskater 02:51, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The removed material was unsourced for quite a long time. It cannot be added back until it can be sourced. Valrith 20:10, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * What kind of source do you want for the list of websites on the network? That needs NO source. And that wasn't the only edit I did, don't use a revert if there are other edits unless you can add what else was added!!!!!!Acidskater 23:02, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Bangbros music group
I think the Bangbros link should redirect to a multiple meaning page, since Bangbros (without the space) is a European harddance act that is gaining popularity. Cwattengard 14:10, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * If the act is notable enough for an article, then I agree. The article Bangbros (harddance) (or somesuch) should be created first, then Bangbros should be converted into a disambig page. Valrith 15:41, 17 June 2007 (UTC)


 * BangBros 41.246.27.173 (talk) 10:50, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

I agree, there should at least be a disambiguation (which I could not be bothered to do ^_^), their site can be found at www.bangbros.biz 96.227.180.112 (talk) 07:11, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

add to article
should this article be expanded? they claim to be the most popular adult website online. --Keithkesslerexp (talk) 05:59, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

I have added accurate information about the number of sites currently affiliated to the network, as well as a detailed list of those sites currently updated and those who are no longer updated. This information is relevant. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kreutzenauer (talk • contribs) 12:31, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Link
Should Wikipedia, one of the most visited site on the planet, be linking to the website? I am not a prude by any stretch, it just seems odd to me is all.Kaobear (talk) 14:14, 7 April 2008 (UTC)


 * It seems appropriate for an article about a website to provide a link to that website. Take a look at any of the articles in Category:Websites. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 02:06, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:BangBus.jpg
The image Image:BangBus.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
 * That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --15:09, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Controversy about the list of affiliated sites
Kreutzenauer, first as an anonymous user, added accurate information about the number of sites affiliated and a list of which ones are currently updated, and which ones are no longer updated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kreutzenauer (talk • contribs) 12:34, 1 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Yes, but Wikipedia is not a directory. There is no reason to provide an advertisement for a commercial network of adult websites. Interested readers can click through the link to the Bang Bros website and find the affiliate sites for themselves. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 18:38, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Question The Sales Figures From 2007
I find it really hard to believe that Bang Bros only earned $1.9 million dollars in 2007. They're a HUGE company in the adult industry. That's just silly... ~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by MelissaKoznuk (talk • contribs) 22:32, 13 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Please read WP:V: "The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth". The source supported the figure in the article. If you can find a reliable source that supports a higher number, please add it to the article. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 02:10, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Bang Bros. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071204173941/http://www.techweb.com:80/wire/security/166401076 to http://www.techweb.com/wire/security/166401076

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 08:25, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Bang Bros. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121225104526/http://xbizawards.xbiz.com/nominees.php to http://xbizawards.xbiz.com/nominees.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 03:33, 25 October 2016 (UTC)