Talk:Bangalore Metro

It looks like there was a discussion on this in (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2011_November_7#Category:Bangalore_Metro) and the category "Bangalore Metro" was removed. But I dont see what is the problem with a category listing of "Bangalore Metro" to appear in a list of Metro or Rapid transit systems in India. Let us say a researcher is studying Metro systems in India, which entry brings that person to the correct page? - a listing of "Namma_Metro" or "Bangalore_Metro"?. Please don't revert these changes as it does not hurt to have a duplicate listing that will bring an information seeked to the correct location. And please dont make this an issue of linguistic jingoism. Kannada people dont need flame wars on Wikipedia to justify a metro name. Xwas (talk) 07:11, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Namma Metro is a colloquial term and a brand name. But it is not a common name by which the Metro is referred to. To an outsider it will be confusing to list Bangalore Metro as "Namma Metro" in Wikipedia. I understand the Parochial and chauvinistic concerns, but it is better to categorize this as "Bangalore Metro"

Xwas (talk) 07:07, 18 June 2010 (UTC)xwas