Talk:Bangerz/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Mr. Gonna Change My Name Forever (talk · contribs) 00:19, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi, I'm Gonna. I forgot to create this page as I read this Bangerz article, but I did so after reading it. This is my sixth GAN review.

Here are the issues I find in this article:


 * No references in the lead (if any).
 * The entirety of this article (especially tone, grammar, and prose) needs a copyedit from the Guild of Copy Editors (GoCE).
 * It reads like a biased news article.
 * Please don't rely heavily on primary sources.
 * "Legacy" is unnecessary.
 * I see incomplete references.
 * Sometimes the article has incorrect formatting.

The result is just a quickfail. Mr* | (60nna) 00:19, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment – Being on a non-biased observer of this article, it seems like this may need a second opinion, for numerous reasons:


 * A) A lead is NEVER to have references in it, which should come as basic knowledge to every Wikipedia editor
 * B) The article is well written, only simple errors that can be addressed in the GA review itself.
 * C) The "Legacy" is non-existent, unless you are referring to the "Impact" section, in which is well sourced and justifiable.
 * A quick fail on this seems unreasonable, so I would suggest re nominating this for a second opinion.  Gia co bbe  talk 00:55, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
 * A quick fail on this seems unreasonable, so I would suggest re nominating this for a second opinion.  Gia co bbe  talk 00:55, 2 April 2014 (UTC)