Talk:Bangla Desh (song)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 09:08, 21 September 2012 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * "Played at a faster tempo than the studio recording, the live version of "Bangla Desh" "roars and rages to a stunning close", Richard Williams of Melody Maker enthused,[72] featuring a "blistering" saxophone solo from Horn[69] and an "astonishingly powerful" vocal from Harrison − "a pure act of zeal", in Leng's description.[63]" - reword this to avoid confusion
 * * Have reworded this. (Hope I've understood your request, that it was that final phrase − "a pure act of zeal", in Leng's description − causing confusion?) JG66 (talk) 00:59, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
 * No it was "Richard Williams of Melody Maker enthused," then you suddenly write "featuring" :)
 * "again at all "
 * * Quite right, thank you. Done. JG66 (talk) 00:59, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Avoid redundant abbrevations such as c/o
 * * Spelt out "care of". JG66 (talk) 00:59, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Hatnotes are placed at the top of sections or articles
 * * Have moved it to top of Background section. (Bit surprised though; to my way of thinking, the concert article is only relevant when a reader gets to the very end of this section. Your call, of course.) JG66 (talk) 00:59, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall: Looks overall ok. Regards.--Kürbis (✔) 17:52, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail:
 * * Thanks, as always, Kürbis. Apologies that my typing seems to have interfered with numerical layout of the points in your review. (Can't work out how to do it properly, I'm afraid ...) JG66 (talk) 00:59, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
 * No problem. Next time I will move the comments from this template to the bottom. Anyway, pass. Regards.--Kürbis (✔) 10:43, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall: Looks overall ok. Regards.--Kürbis (✔) 17:52, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail:
 * * Thanks, as always, Kürbis. Apologies that my typing seems to have interfered with numerical layout of the points in your review. (Can't work out how to do it properly, I'm afraid ...) JG66 (talk) 00:59, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
 * No problem. Next time I will move the comments from this template to the bottom. Anyway, pass. Regards.--Kürbis (✔) 10:43, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
 * No problem. Next time I will move the comments from this template to the bottom. Anyway, pass. Regards.--Kürbis (✔) 10:43, 24 September 2012 (UTC)