Talk:Bangladesh–Pakistan relations

Title of article
"Pakistan" is a proper noun, and "Bangladeshi" is an adjective.

Why is this article not titled "Pakistani-Bangladeshi relations" or "Pakistan-Bangladesh" relations? You wouldn't refer to "Poland-German relations." KConWiki (talk) 02:33, 28 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Good point, I have now moved the article Pahari Sahib  02:36, 28 May 2008 (UTC)


 * I think the move is incorrect, and does not match the convention. All other articles on bilateral relations use the country names rather than the adjectives ... the current title is also misleading as it gives the hint of relationship between Pakistanis and Bangladeshis, rather than the two countries. I'm moving it to Pakistan-Bangladesh relations. Also, isn't the convention for bilateral relations to use alphabetical order in the country names? --Ragib (talk) 07:23, 28 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Coming to think of it, you do have a point here *pinches self* with the first issue you raise :-), perhaps it should be Pakistan-Bangladesh relations, as for the second point this is not the case, have you seen, for example, Indo-Bangladeshi relations? Pahari Sahib  08:11, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Trade volume
The section Establishment and growth of bilateral relations states that "Trade between the two countries currently stands at $340 million", with "currently" not defined. The section Trade states that "The total value of trade (export plus import) between the two countries in 2010-11 was about $983 million." What gives?Truth or consequences-2 (talk) 21:23, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Wrong map of India
The map shown for India is inaccurate. Authors might be liable to legal action if no changes are made in the next 15 days. 45.115.89.186 (talk) 15:31, 17 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Did you file that lawsuit?
 * Map is still the same... looks like only talk. Mightygoose (talk) 07:16, 27 December 2023 (UTC)