Talk:Bangladesh International School, Dammam/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: KJP1 (talk · contribs) 20:13, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Quick fail criteria assessment

 * 1) The article is a long way from meeting any one of the GA criteria.
 * 2) The article contains copyright violations.
 * 3) There are cleanup banners that are obviously still valid, including cleanup, wikify, NPOV, unreferenced or large numbers of fact, clarifyme, or similar tags.
 * 4) The article is unstable.
 * 1) There are cleanup banners that are obviously still valid, including cleanup, wikify, NPOV, unreferenced or large numbers of fact, clarifyme, or similar tags.
 * 2) The article is unstable.
 * 1) The article is unstable.

The article fails Criterion 2 as, with the exception of the final paragraph and the Board of Directors section which is sourced to itself, it is completely unsourced. It also reads like a prospectus, rather than an objective article. KJP1 (talk) 20:13, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Main review
1. It is well written.
 * a (prose):


 * b (MoS):

2. It is verifiable with No original research.
 * a (references)


 * b (citations to reliable sources)


 * c (OR)


 * d (No evidence of plagiarism or copyright violations)

3. It is broad in its scope.
 * a (major aspects)


 * b (focused)

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

5. It is stable. 6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):


 * b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: