Talk:Banksia acanthopoda/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Review and comments forthcoming...

Reviewer: –  VisionHolder  «  talk  »  15:36, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Pass: I made a few small changes, most notably by using the Convert template. (I did notice an error in the handling of sigfigs when dealing with temps, but I have reported it to the template's talk page, and it should be fixed soon.) I used the template to ensure MoS was followed in regards to non-breaking spaces, which were not consistent on the page prior to the edit. All-in-all, it is well-written, thorough (given our current understanding of the plant), and appears to meet all MoS requirements.


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Good job! –  VisionHolder  «  talk  »  16:50, 12 February 2010 (UTC)