Talk:Baptist Lui Ming Choi Secondary School

Assess
A good start. Pictures are good and text is interesting. What is missing is references. You do them....(see below) Victuallers 09:44, 23 May 2007 (UTC) Do comeback when you have 10 or 15 of these for reassessment. Refs still required Victuallers 10:01, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Look at source - look at other top articles
This page was previously nominated for deletion. See Votes for deletion/Baptist Lui Ming Choi Secondary School for the result. JYolkowski // talk 13:29, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Shatin D.gif
The image Image:Shatin D.gif is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
 * That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --22:33, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Baptist Lui Ming Choi Secondary School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added tag to http://www.blmcss.edu.hk/nss/cs_so.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050511235825/http://www.hkbaptist.org.hk:80/ to http://www.hkbaptist.org.hk

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:25, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Article issues
For over 12 years this article has been in need of sourcing. There is far too much unsourced content. Surely there is more than one source or notability is in doubt. Otr500 (talk) 12:40, 20 November 2019 (UTC)