Talk:Baptiste Serin

Failed "good article" nomination
Upon its review on July 1, 2017, this good article nomination was quick-failed because it:


 * had a virtual or complete lack of reliable sources

thus making it ineligible for good article consideration. According to Verifiability, "Material that is challenged or likely to be challenged, and all quotations, must be attributed to a reliable, published source."

This article did not receive a thorough review, and may not meet other parts of the good article criteria. I encourage you to remedy this problem (and any others) and resubmit it for consideration. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a Good article reassessment. Thank you for your work so far. TheDragonFire (talk) 05:36, 1 July 2017 (UTC)