Talk:Barakat Foundation

Reuters
You added the description of Reuters about SETAD in the first paragraph of lead of article which is about Barakat Foundation. Why do you give such weight to the description of Reuters? the first paragraph of lead or lead is not an appropriate place for mentioning this material as well as this saying of Reuters. Please justify your edits.Saff V. (talk) 11:34, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Where do you think it should be? Is the Reuters report not credible? Stefka Bulgaria (talk) 12:18, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I never say that Reuters is not reliable! The best place for claims of Reuters is the body of the article, Maybe the history section! Please note that, as WP:MOSLEAD demanded, It should identify the topic, establish context, explain why the topic is notable, and summarize the most important points, including any prominent controversies. material which were added in your edits would be controversies.Saff V. (talk) 06:05, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
 * If you agree that the Reuters report is reliable, then it's lede-worthy to outline that Barakat foundation "is a unit of a massive business empire controlled by Ayatollah Ali Khamenei that is known as Setad Ejraiye Farmane Hazrate Emam". That definitely identifies and important point, including a prominent controversy. Stefka Bulgaria (talk) 08:54, 12 April 2020 (UTC)