Talk:Baramu language

Horribly problematic article
This article surely violates NPOV in 1000 different ways, veering off into a rant about "true Biblical history". Much of this article obviously and egregiously wrong. It says that this language is "Sematic[sic]" and part "Aramic[sic], Hebrew and Asian." I don't know the correct way to mark articles for issues, and, as I know next to nothing about this subject, I don't think I can rectify it myself, but I hope to see it fixed somehow. L&#39;homme des citrons (talk) 05:50, 14 November 2020 (UTC)