Talk:Barbara Crawford Johnson

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 20 September 2018 and 21 December 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Taylorkeefer. Peer reviewers: Liangdanica, Laurenmac1.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 17:49, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Additional possible references

 * Photograph from the Reuther library at Wayne State University
 * Saari, Peggy. 1996. Prominent women of the 20th century. New York: U.X.L. http://catalog.hathitrust.org/api/volumes/oclc/33162020.html. ; Page 544-546
 * American Women of Science Since 1900: Essays A-H. Vol.1 By Tiffany K. Wayne, p. 551-552 -- mentions birth year, specific job titles and years

Hope this helps! 63.251.123.2 (talk) 22:53, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Taylorkeefer (talk) 22:33, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Barbara Crawford Johnson | University of Illinois Archives, . for Photograph
 * “150 For 150.” Go to 150 for 150., . for Biography
 * “Barbara Crawford Johnson.” National Aeronautics and Space Administration Wiki, . for Cultural References
 * Bloquetech. “Figuras Ocultas: Barbara Crawford Johnson.” BLOQUETECH, 16 Oct. 2018,.
 * “Women and Ideas in Engineering.” Google Books,
 * cr4.Globalspec.com,.

Peer Review

 * 1) First, what does the article do well? Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Any turn of phrase that described the subject in a clear way?
 * Great categories! Once there is more information in each subsection, the article will be very easy to follow. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laurenmac1 (talk • contribs)
 * 1) What changes would you suggest the author(s) apply to the article? Why would those changes be an improvement?
 * So far the only change I can see that is needed is more information on Barbara Crawford Johnson in order to fill in the subsections you have created. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laurenmac1 (talk • contribs)
 * 1) What's the most important thing the author(s) could do to improve the article?
 * Find more resources! I understand how difficult this is for an underrepresented female in STEM, as I am also struggling to find information that is not a direct source from the person herself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laurenmac1 (talk • contribs)
 * 1) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? Let them know!
 * I could apply a similar structure to my article, because I have been struggling with organization. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laurenmac1 (talk • contribs)