Talk:Barbara Niven

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Barbara Niven. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130613155557/http://www.hallmarkchannel.com:80/cedarcove/cast/Barbara_Niven to http://www.hallmarkchannel.com/cedarcove/cast/Barbara_Niven

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 05:05, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Filmography notes
Do not wish to separate into film and television tables so as to retain at the beginning the entire list of shows with indication of “billed as” names. Keeping them sequential makes it easier to follow, and to footnote.

Also added the “show/hide” to provide a way to ‘close’ the table, if desired.

 O ld B eeg  .. warble ·· 14:23, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Autograph of Barbara Niven from Print of Affirmation Num4 purchased online.jpg


The file File:Autograph of Barbara Niven from Print of Affirmation Num4 purchased online.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "WP:DECORATIVE non-free use in Barbara Niven which fails WP:NFCC and possibly WP:NFCC. Most signatures aren't eligible for copyright protection under US copyright law per c:Commons:When to use the PD-signature tag which means it's possible this one doesn't need to be treated as non-free content and a free equivalent could be found or created per WP:FREER. The claim that the autograph is 'unique' is not supported by any sourced critical commentary anywhere in the article itself which means the justification for it's non-free use (even in the main infobox) is quite questionable. If Niven's authograph is so unique that reliable sources discuss it and content related to it can be added to the article, then perhaps this could be keep even as non-free content. Otherwise, I'm not seeing a justification for its use and how removing it from the article will be deterimental to the reader's understanding of what's written about Niven."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:01, 29 September 2022 (UTC)