Talk:Barberenachampsa

Nomen nudum
Dilkes and Arcucci (2012) as well as Langer et al. (2007) regard the name "Barberenachampsa" as a nomen nudum. Dilkes and Arcucci (2012) mentioned that name once: "P. nodosa has been placed in a new genus Barberenachampsa by Kischlat (2000), but the name is invalid because it was not formally introduced as a new taxon". Furthermore, any paper I know of, even Kischlat and Schultz (1999) treat P. nodosa as a species of Proterochampsa, so I think we should redirect "Barberenachampsa" page to Proterochampsa. If someone disagrees, please let me know... Rnnsh (talk) 15:58, 21 June 2012 (UTC)