Talk:Barczewo

Zenderowski
W. Zenderowski runs a private webpage on Barczewo. I don't think this is a reliable source. HerkusMonte (talk) 13:23, 5 January 2012 (UTC)


 * How does running a private webpage make him unreliable? We aren't using it anyway.Btw:could you answer about quotes from unknown person Irma Bartlick in the other article?--MyMoloboaccount (talk) 13:39, 5 January 2012 (UTC)


 * He has an article on pl wiki (pl:Wojciech Zenderowski). No major red flags as I can see. Amateur/local historian publishing in regional publication, nothing cited to him seems extraordinary/fringe, through I NPOVed the tone of the sentence. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 03:56, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Should only be used if attributed (which it is presently) - and even then borderline. A better source (e.g. an English language history book) on such a contentious topic should be preferred.Icewhiz (talk) 04:17, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Why are Poles seperated from main history
Why is Polish majority which formed the integral history of the city moved into separate place from main history? This goes against normal format of articles. --MyMoloboaccount (talk) 13:40, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Because the article needs some structure, a subsection focusing on a certain aspect of history improves the readability. HerkusMonte (talk) 08:15, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

The article needs a subsection because it needs a subsection? You haven't presented any reason why Poles who constituted majority of the population should be separated in any way from the history of this Polish city.--MyMoloboaccount (talk) 07:43, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
 * An article needs some structure to improve the readability. Large sections of text are extremely tedious. HerkusMonte (talk) 08:00, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

This article doesn't need any additional structure as it is quite readable. You haven't presented any arguments why Polish population should be separated from the main history of this Polish city. As such I will restore the readable version.--MyMoloboaccount (talk) 08:03, 16 January 2012 (UTC)


 * It took a few years, but I merged this into a single section. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 03:56, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Barczewo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120426085516/http://ramsko.webd.pl/umb2011/index.php/historia/3-historia to http://ramsko.webd.pl/umb2011/index.php/historia/3-historia

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 15:06, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Barczewo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120426085516/http://ramsko.webd.pl/umb2011/index.php/historia/3-historia to http://ramsko.webd.pl/umb2011/index.php/historia/3-historia

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 15:38, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Dubious text
Text such as "eventually both Poles and Jews were classified as subhuman and targeted for extermination " - besides contradicting most or all Holocaust scholars (who generally see some differences between Nazi atrocities towards Poles and Jews) is cited to the town's webpage which is not a RS for WWII history, and per my reading does not contain this very unusual "fact".Icewhiz (talk) 04:05, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
 * - as you last restored this text, I'd appreciate if you could address this. Icewhiz (talk) 07:22, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Poor generalization, removed. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 02:07, 3 March 2019 (UTC)