Talk:Bareilly

Original Research
Regarding this diff, I have reverted it twice now. The first time was because it was a lot of new information that had no references at all. At face value, the information looks sound, but one of Wikipedia's core policy is that of verifiability and it lacked references - I made a friendly note on the editor's talk here, this editor was not logged in at the time. My reversion was then undone by user M.chohan, with a note "I'm currently writing an article on the Mutiny of 1857 and this is an extract, please comment on lack of cite references". Well, to promptly comment, I think that if that is truly the case this constitutes clear original research and is not appropriate for Wikipedia without the proper citations. Tanthalas39 (talk) 22:35, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Style
I have done a clean up on this article today to bring it more in line with the Manual of Style and its associated manuals, including: I encourage editors to become more familiar with the Manual of Style before reverting my edits. Thanks. Ground Zero | t 15:09, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
 * removed repeated links an link to plain English words per WP:OVERLINK
 * removed incorrect boldfacing per WP:BOLDFACE
 * fixed the capitalisation of headings per WP:HEAD
 * fixed the formatting of dates and numbers per WP:MOSNUM
 * The Lead section is excessive, so I am going to have a look at it and will look at grammar etc. also. --Soulparadox 23:19, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Edited the "Ancient History" section, removed repeated statements, put in some links and moved one general content paragraph to the summary section (how do I quote a part of the article?). I'm not too sure about this, though. So if someone thinks it should be replaced/edited/removed, please go ahead! Sudo23 (talk) 04:30, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

copyedit
Copyedited this. Comments: Cheers. Feedback encouraged. Lfstevens (talk) 07:58, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The population #s don't make sense. It's not possible that the total pop is 898,167 and the 0-6 pop is 669,681. Also, the gender ratios don't make sense. There can't be 883 men per thousand people.
 * "The experiment in non-monarchical form of Government in Panchala". This needs a better explanation. What experiment? What form?
 * I switched to Ahichatra, as in the WP article on the subject. If that's incorrect, the other article needs to be renamed.
 * Commented this out: रवि प्रभाकर फ़तेहगंज प0
 * Added some tags.

Assessment comment
Substituted at 08:58, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Bareilly. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120526171946/http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Bareilly to http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Bareilly
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090601024404/http://www.indianrailways.gov.in/financecode/ADMIN_FINANCE/AdminFinanceCh1_Data.htm to http://www.indianrailways.gov.in/financecode/ADMIN_FINANCE/AdminFinanceCh1_Data.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 16:18, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Bareilly. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.censusindia.net/results/data/upd_uatowns.PDF
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151017164642/http://www.imd.gov.in/doc/climateimp.pdf to http://www.imd.gov.in/doc/climateimp.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 08:33, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Bareilly. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070714233142/http://members.rediff.com/gangwar/Bareilly.html to http://members.rediff.com/gangwar/Bareilly.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100826065926/http://bareilly.nic.in/hist.htm to http://bareilly.nic.in/hist.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100826065926/http://bareilly.nic.in/hist.htm to http://bareilly.nic.in/hist.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130312053421/http://www.afghan-network.net/Culture/afghan-guyana.htm to http://www.afghan-network.net/Culture/afghan-guyana.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120214225139/http://www.collectbritain.co.uk/personalisation/object.cfm?uid=019WDZ000000187U00000000 to http://www.collectbritain.co.uk/personalisation/object.cfm?uid=019WDZ000000187U00000000
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070202191522/http://www.india-defence.com/reports/2849 to http://www.india-defence.com/reports/2849
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110609131125/http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/MONITOR/ISSUE3-4/bajwa.html to http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/MONITOR/ISSUE3-4/bajwa.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 04:58, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Establishments in Bareilly
You have not added establishments of Bareilly which are of national importance. For example : Indian Vaterniary reserch Institute, NE Railway workshop, Rohilkhand university.Rajatbindalbly (talk) 16:30, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

I feel history of Bareilly as PAnchal Pradesh need be highlighted and needs more text.Rajatbindalbly (talk) 16:30, 23 February 2019 (UTC)