Talk:Baron Byron

Fair use rationale for Image:Baron Byron coa.png
Image:Baron Byron coa.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:36, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Have now "closed up the gap with our English (and Australian) dead"
— Sizzle Flambé (☎/✍) 03:34, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

(of the poet) "... commonly known as Lord Byron"
The problem with adding "commonly known as Lord Byron" next to just one of the Barons Byron is that each of them was commonly known (and addressed) by that honorific during their incumbency as Baron, between succeeding to the title and dying themselves, as is the present Baron Byron today. The poet's cousin and successor commanded a Royal Navy ship to Hawaii; there is a book about it titled With Lord Byron at the Sandwich Islands in 1825, ISBN 9780554605265; read more about the voyage at HMS Blonde (1819). The poet's great-uncle and predecessor, the "Wicked Lord" or "Devil Byron", is referred to as "Lord Byron" throughout his own article. I think it would be a capital mistake, inducing confusion, to encourage people to lean upon a shared term ("Lord Byron") rather than his distinctive individual name ("George Gordon Byron"), to identify the poet. — Sizzle Flambé (☎/✍) 05:02, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I think the Lord Byron, that is the poet, is an exceptional case. However, if having it there in the list of Barons Byron weakens the article or weakens the encyclopedia then remove it.  I would like to see the hat-note stay though.  Hatnotes of this type are to send people who land on the wrong page on their way quickly and efficiently.  davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail)  05:06, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
 * re: changes: not what I would prefer but you know this article and subject matter better than I do.  davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail)  05:21, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I think the idea of hatnote and additional note by listing entry, each saying in effect "the poet's over HERE!", was excellent, I'm very grateful to you for adding both, and glad to keep both. It's just the idea of referring to only one man as "Lord Byron" in an article full of Lords Byron that I can't fathom. Especially since a series of other men have held the title since 1824, and one holds it today (the best claim of all). It's like saying the term "Mister President" should redirect to Abraham Lincoln because he's the President you think of first, never mind all the other Presidents there have been, or the one there is now. — Sizzle Flambé (☎/✍) 05:43, 28 November 2009 (UTC)