Talk:Baron Greville

Claimants
Some one removed my reinsertion of 5th and 6th barons as part of the title. This appears to be correct. The earlier claimant was the son of a niece, apparently through a relationship that must be incestuous. If so, this would be an illegitimate descent, which cannot give rise to a valid claim to a peerage. NB please log in before editing: this helps the rest of us editors. Peterkingiron (talk) 12:08, 27 February 2009 (UTC)