Talk:Baron Sinha

Failed in his claim?
It sounds to me that the 2nd Baron succeeded in his claim per. Kittybrewster  &#9742;  12:44, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Complete Peerage says he succeeded, on the date given for his rejection before I edited; I think we are dealing with nationalist self-pity - again.


 * While it may be true that his nationality was brought up against his son, CP XIII indicates that the issue is the lack of documentation; they sent a mission to Calcutta to take testimony.  Septentrionalis PMAnderson 22:02, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

"potentially polygamous marriage"
This quotation - and the whole line of argument that the second Lord Sinha was not eligible to sit because he was an Indian - is not in the Complete Peerage. Where is it from? Is it true? A citation is needed; especially since this page has been vandalized to make the British look prejudiced. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 19:14, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Rayment is useful; but the text needs rewriting if no other source is cited. The mention of polygamy in the decision, as Rayment quotes it, is obiter dictum; it does not show that the objection was raised, and remarks that Sinha's marriage always was monogamous.Septentrionalis PMAnderson 04:51, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I think we have reached what ought to be a stable text. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:57, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Baron Sinha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120316225418/http://www.cracroftspeerage.co.uk/online/content/index1149.htm to http://www.cracroftspeerage.co.uk/online/content/index1149.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 13:22, 27 October 2016 (UTC)