Talk:Baroona Hall

Article name
"Baroona Labor Hall" seems an odd name for this article, considering that it only took it on from some period in the mid-twentieth century until an unknown time thereafter, and the article itself seems to use "Baroona Hall". Any objections to a move? The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 04:34, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Go for it. In a lot of these heritage register articles, there are a number of alternative names that might be better choices or at least useful redirects. For reasons best known to themselves, some of the articles are titled by the name of tenant at the time of the heritage-listing, e.g. "Best and Less" and "City Duty Free" that hardly evoke a sense of heritage and may not be the current occupant in any case. With those, I tend to look for one of the older names. In this one, I would be tempted to use or at least redirect "United Brothers Lodge" as you can still see those words on the front of the building if you look carefully. Kerry (talk) 05:33, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Decided to just do it. Done. Kerry (talk) 05:33, 6 January 2015 (UTC)